![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Herceptin: a Promising Advance in the Treatment of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analyses from clinical trials of Herceptin in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, in which patients received postoperative chemotherapy with or without Herceptin |
||||
Study |
Number of patients |
Time since start of treatment |
Reduction in risk of cancer recurring with Herceptin versus without Herceptin |
Reduction in risk of death with Herceptin versus without Herceptin |
NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831*† |
3968 |
4 years |
52% |
35% |
HERA |
3401 |
3 years |
37% |
34% |
BCIRG 006† |
3222 |
4 years |
33% and 39%** |
33% and 41%** |
FinHer |
232 |
3 years |
58% |
Result not significant |
*Combined analysis. ** Depending on chemotherapy used. † Interim analysis. |
||||
The combined analysis also showed that after a total of 4 years of follow-up, the number of deaths among women who received Herceptin was reduced by 35% relative to those who did not receive Herceptin. The overall survival rate after 4 years of follow-up was 93% in patients treated with Herceptin plus chemotherapy versus 89% who received chemotherapy alone. After a follow-up period in the HERA study of only 2 years, there was a 34% improvement in the overall survival rate of patients treated with 12 months of Herceptin compared to those who did not receive it.
In a small trial known as the FinHer (Finland Herceptin) study, 232 patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer received either 9 weeks of Herceptin with chemotherapy or chemotherapy without Herceptin as post-surgical treatment. This trial used an unconventional chemotherapy regimen. After a total of 3 years, more patients were free of disease in the group that received Herceptin but the trial was too small to allow detection of a statistically significant difference in overall survival between treatments. Although the disease-free data is promising, the small number of patients treated in this trial and serious imbalances between the Herceptin and no Herceptin treatment groups, means the results have to be interpreted with great caution and are less certain than for the four larger studies involving 12 months of Herceptin treatment and more data are needed to confirm possible benefits of this short course.
In many countries, regulatory approval agencies, which evaluate available clinical and cost effectiveness data for pharmaceutical treatments, have fast-tracked their assessments of Herceptin. 24 OECD countries now fund 12 months of Herceptin treatment for patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. As of 1st July 2007, New Zealand became the only country to fund only 9 weeks of treatment, based on the FinHer results.
Unknown long-term outcome in women with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer
It is important to note that to date the period of follow-up for the trials in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer is only 2-4 years, and so the available results are considered short-term. Long-term outcome in women with early-stage breast cancer taking Herceptin is not yet known; for example, it is not clear how many lives may be saved each year, nor for how long women’s lives may be prolonged by treatment with Herceptin. Follow-up in these studies will continue for up to 10 years, so additional information will become available over time, which may change the results seen so far.
Side effects are usually mild but some serious problems can occur.
As with any treatment, side effects can occur with Herceptin, but they are usually mild. The most common events are temporary flu-like symptoms including fever and chills, which usually occur during or shortly after administration of the first dose. Other possible side effects include diarrhoea, headache, pain, and cough. Among more serious events, allergic reactions and serious breathing problems can occur rarely. Heart failure has occurred in 0.6% of patients when Herceptin is given following chemotherapy, and up to 4% when given at the same time as taxane-based chemotherapy. In some cases specific drug treatment was required but in most patients, heart function recovered after stopping Herceptin. No cardiac-related deaths were reported after 2 years follow-up in the HERA trial, a median of 3 years follow-up in an interim analysis of data from BCIRG 006 or at least 4 years of follow-up according to an interim analysis of cardiac safety data from the NSABP B-31 study. Cardiac risk seems to be greater if Herceptin is given with the anthracyclines, which is a class of chemotherapy drugs that includes doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and epirubicin (Pharmorubicin), and in women with previous heart problems. Therefore, patients need to be checked for heart problems before being given Herceptin and their heart function monitored during treatment to detect any problems that might be developing. In the vast majority of patients, the risk of heart damage is small compared to the risk of the cancer advancing.
Where to from here?
Currently available findings from studies in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer are encouraging, most notably the near 50% reduction in the risk of cancer recurrence and the reduction in risk of death of around one third. These early benefits compare well with those of adjuvant chemotherapy with aromatase inhibitors, which require longer patient follow-up for advantages in disease-free survival and overall survival to become apparent. Notwithstanding the current absence of data on long-term outcome, Herceptin has become a preferred component in the treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, since it gives women with this aggressive disease a chance of staying healthy and staying alive for longer than they otherwise might.
September 2007
|
|
Policy Statement: Although great care has been taken in compiling the content of this publication, the publisher and its servants are not responsible or in any way liable for the currency of the information, or for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies, or for any consequences arising therefrom. Inclusion or exclusion of any product does not imply its use is either advocated or rejected. This publication does not imply endorsement by the Publisher for or against any decision made by any government agency related to the marketing approval or funding of any product. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement. Approved product information should be reviewed before prescribing. |