![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
A Breast Physician is a medical practitioner who works in the clinical practice of breast disease diagnosis, adopting a holistic approach to investigation and management. The breast physician may interpret mammograms, perform clinical examinations and biopsies, perform ultrasounds, provide counseling and contribute as a member of a multi-disciplinary team, an approach widely recognised as one of the most effective in the management of women with breast problems. A Breast Physician has an extensive knowledge and understanding of all the specialties involved with breast disease and so is able to coordinate appropriate care and patient follow up. Our Breast Physicians are valuable resources and we cannot afford to lose them. The Australasian Society of Breast Physicians (ASBP) is under threat of de-registration by the Medical Council of New Zealand. Read more about BCAC’s support for the ASBP.
Medical Council Revokes Specialist Status of Breast Physicians The strongly stated views of a wide range of patients, survivors and their representatives failed to sway the Medical Council from their earlier decision to revoke the specialist status of Breast Physicians in New Zealand. BCAC, the Breast Cancer Network, Breast Cancer Support, other breast cancer organisations and individuals made submissions to the Council in June seeking to reverse the decision and keep Breast Physicians working at the front line in multi-disciplinary clinics. ‘This is very disappointing,’ said BCAC Chair Libby Burgess, ‘and yet another blow for women with breast cancer in our country. Many of us have received care from a Breast Physician and can attest to their professional competency and thoroughness. The Council decision is very short-sighted and means we have lost valuable resources. I’d like to thank all those people who wrote in to the Medical Council, standing up for our Breast Physicians.’ The Medical Council decided to revoke the specialist status because it felt the training and professional development of Breast Physicians was not up to standard. There are currently five doctors working as Breast Physicians in New Zealand and it is not known at this stage whether the Australasian Society of Breast Physicians will appeal the decision or review their processes to work towards compliance.
BCAC Condemns Threat to Breast Physicians by Medical Council Breast Cancer Aotearoa Coalition (BCAC) The Breast Cancer Aotearoa Coalition (BCAC) is concerned and dismayed over a decision by the New Zealand Medical Council (NZMC) to de-register the Australasian Society of Breast Physicians (ASBP). Last week, the shortening of waiting lists denied women the option of breast reconstruction in the public system. A pending strike by radiologists this week will delay treatment for many. A Hearing to review the Medical Council decision is scheduled for Tuesday June 13th and could bring even more bad news to New Zealand women with breast cancer if the de-registering is upheld. ‘Two upsetting announcements for women with breast cancer in one week is more than enough, ‘said BCAC Chair Libby Burgess. ‘We don’t need another.’ Ms Burgess said the de-registration of Breast Physicians would be yet another blow for breast cancer patients, adding that it would close the door on a positive career path into breast medicine for bright, young physicians, a loss that women with breast cancer can ill afford. Breast Physicians are trained doctors who specialise in the growing area of breast medicine. These specialists can not only expedite a timely and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer but have a wide range of skills to offer women. They bring expertise, an extensive knowledge of women’s health issues and focus to the ‘multi-disciplinary team’, an approach internationally recognized as optimal for the treatment of breast cancer. They perform biopsies, follow-up on patients pre- and post-operatively, read mammograms, provide counseling, undertake research and do administration and management work. ‘They travel with the patient on her breast cancer journey,’ said Ms Burgess. ‘They are the glue that holds the multi-disciplinary team together, simplifying the process, helping the patient understand her diagnosis and make well-informed treatment decisions. ‘BCAC members fortunate enough to have received care from New Zealand’s few Breast Physicians know first hand the value that these people bring to breast cancer treatment. The Medical Council will be failing the women of New Zealand and their families if it refuses to reaccredit the Australasian Society of Breast Physicians. New Zealand women will be deprived of valuable support at the breast cancer ‘front line’ where it is needed the most.’
Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ) Proposal to Revoke the Vocational Scope of Breast Medicine (September 2006) The following document was sent by BCAC in response to the MCNZ proposal to de-register the Australasian Society of Breast Physicians (ASBP). The MCNZ proposal can be viewed at: 31 October 2006 Ms Megan Purves Re: Proposal to Revoke the Vocational Scope of Breast Medicine Consultation Paper, September 2006, Medical Council of New Zealand Dear Ms Purves, The Breast Cancer Aotearoa Coalition (BCAC) would like to express its continued dismay over the Medical Council’s decision (September 2005) that the Australasian Society of Breast Physicians (ASBP) not be granted reaccreditation. As a consumer group representing women with breast cancer in New Zealand, we believe this outcome will have an adverse effect on the diagnosis, treatment and care of women with this disease in our country. We strongly support the reaccreditation of the ASBP and urge you to reconsider your decision. We welcome the opportunity to respond to the above mentioned Consultation Paper and the following is our response to the question: How will you or members of your organisation be affected if breast medicine is not recognized as a vocational scope of practice in future? I write on behalf of our members – the majority breast cancer survivors – with whom I have consulted in preparation of this response. I have detailed our response under six topics we believe have direct relevance to the care of our women with breast cancer, all areas where women would be seriously disadvantaged if the vocational scope of breast medicine was no longer recognised by the MCNZ. Breast Cancer inNew Zealand
The Breast Physician This unique specialty provides valuable, much needed focus on a disease that claims the lives of over 600 New Zealand women every year. BCAC is surprised and disappointed that the Medical Council has seen fit to reject the application for reaccreditation of Breast Physicians as there is clearly a need for greater support and resource allocation in this area. Loss of this specialty would serve only to reduce the options and provision of critical services to New Zealand women faced with a breast cancer diagnosis. Without the formal recognition of Breast Physicians through Medical Council accreditation, talented young medical professionals are less likely to be attracted to this area of medicine, and this would have a long-term detrimental effect on the quality of care provided to breast cancer patients. 1. Breast Physicians are an integral part of the multi-disciplinary team approach to managing the diagnosis, treatment and care of breast cancer patients A multi-disciplinary approach is widely recognised as optimal for the treatment of breast cancer (e.g., J Michael Dixon, RCF Leonard 1996. BMJ 312:145-8), offering the best outcomes for breast cancer patients. In fact, changes in the focus of breast cancer treatments have demanded such an approach. Modern techniques have created a need for specialists (surgeons, pathologists, radiologists and so on) to communicate well and many now work in such teams of which Breast Physicians are a key component. It is an approach that forms the cornerstone of Australia’s breast cancer treatment (where outcomes for women with breast cancer are 28% better than they are for women in New Zealand, Skegg et al. 2002) and is also lauded in New Zealand’s Cancer Control Action Plan 2005-2010 (Goal 3: Ensure effective diagnosis and treatment of cancer to reduce morbidity and mortality; Objective 1: Provide optimal treatment for those with cancer; Objective 2: Develop defined standards for diagnosis, treatment and care for those with cancer; p47). Indeed it is very likely that the multi-disciplinary team approach will be a recommendation of the guidelines for breast cancer, soon to be developed by the New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG) under contract to the Ministry of Health (contract signed October 2006). Revoking the vocational scope of breast medicine now would be a backward step which could then necessitate a costly reinstatement in the near future. Given that New Zealand struggles with shortages of radiologists and other specialist physicians, there is particular value in the breast physician whose skills and training cover the range of disciplines found within a multi-disciplinary team. Without this broader specialty, New Zealand’s limited medical resources will continue to provide a barrier to the establishment of additional multi-disciplinary teams with the necessary breadth of skills to function effectively. Breast Physicians embody an efficient means of providing many of the required specialist areas of knowledge needed to provide optimal care. The ASBP requires its members to work within a multi-disciplinary team. BCAC applauds this requirement while the MCNZ regards this as grounds for de-registration because such a practice ‘…is sustainable only in large centres’. Such an approach condemns women throughout New Zealand to less than optimal care and therefore less than optimal outcomes. Our relatively poor survival statistics (Skegg et al. 2002) demonstrate that women need more specialist clinics across the country, adequately staffed by qualified professionals including Breast Physicians. 2. Multi-disciplinary teams outside Auckland could benefit from the employment of Breast Physicians and offer improved treatment to patients as a result Council also states that ‘The ASBP did not produce robust evidence of improved outcomes in treatment of patients when a Breast Physician was involved.’ BCAC questions whether sufficient data is yet available to establish this, given the relatively small number of Breast Physicians and the fact that there is presently no systematic nationwide collection of breast cancer data in New Zealand. The exception to this is the Auckland Breast Cancer Register, which has collected data since 2000. If an area of specialty requires such robust, long-term survival data before its existence can be justified, then it is hard to envisage how the Council could approve the emergence of any new specialty areas. Establishing ‘robust evidence of improved outcomes’, when there are no comparative data from other regions lacking Breast Physicians, will be difficult indeed. We presume also that the Council is concerned only with survival statistics when referring to ‘outcomes’. BCAC challenges this. Breast cancer does not kill patients immediately. The demand for long-term survival figures to support reaccreditation of Breast Physicians seems a cynical move, and an argument all too often used to maintain the status quo in cancer treatment in New Zealand. Ironically, the longer breast cancer patients live, the longer the wait for this ‘robust evidence’ to support improvements in their care. For a woman facing breast cancer, the quality of treatment she receives and the psychological outcome can be greatly improved by the addition of a Breast Physician to her medical team, regardless of the final outcome in terms of her continued survival. Many members of BCAC can attest to this from personal experience. 3. The knowledge of the Breast Physician overlaps other medical disciplines and this benefits patients With the addition of the Breast Physician, the patient can have a direct report from an expert with a comprehensive overview of all the disciplines involved, someone who has attended each meeting in person and can explain how decisions about options for her care were reached. This is a tremendous support for the patient, providing her with a sense that she has a ‘direct line’ to the team, someone on her side who has expert knowledge and can present her concerns to the other specialists with sufficient technical credibility to be heard well. With a Breast Physician on her team, the patient has a tangible sense that there is someone else seeing the whole picture of her case, understanding her emotional concerns, interacting with all the other doctors, and synthesising all the relevant information. Breast Physicians perform biopsies, follow-up on patients pre- and post-operatively, read mammograms, conduct ultrasound examinations, provide counseling, undertake research and do administration and management work. They are well and comprehensively trained, knowledgeable in a range of women’s health issues and dedicated to their area of specialty. In short, Breast Physicians bring an extraordinary amount of expertise, skill and focus to a multi-disciplinary team and have much to offer patients. Those of us who have experienced breast cancer with the specialist treatment, guidance and support of the Breast Physician can attest to this. The breadth of experience and knowledge of the Breast Physician, combined with the ability to effectively communicate with the patient, are invaluable skills. In particular, the ability of a trained specialist to translate the complex medical information being provided by surgeon and oncologist into understandable and manageable knowledge enables the patient to progress through the highly stressful journey that is breast cancer with greater confidence. This enables the patient to face difficult, unpalatable decisions with a degree of composure and clarity, and thus facilitates optimal engagement in well-informed decision-making. As previously mentioned, the breadth of knowledge and expertise embodied in the Breast Physician efficiently provides specialist input across a range of disciplines, making the optimal multi-disciplinary approach more feasible in New Zealand’s environment of limited medical resources. 4. Breast Physicians can help alleviate a nationwide shortage of radiologists It is now established that radiologists who specialise in reading mammograms are better able to detect the heterogeneous population of malignant breast lesions that indicate breast cancer. For example, the United States Mammography Quality Standards Act 1992 requires that interpreting physicians maintain ongoing experience, defined as 960 examinations per 24 months (Finder, 2004. Implementation of the MSQA, presentation available at: www.iom.edu/Object.File/Master/20/809/Finder.ppt#256, 1, Implementation of the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA)). The BreastScreen Aotearoa programme is falling short of its screening targets (only 48% of eligible women are being screened despite a 70% target. Source: Percentage derived by BCAC from data contained in Independent Monitoring Reports Jan – June 2005 and July – Dec 2005, www.healthywomen.org.nz) and this is partly due to a lack of resources to fulfill the programme’s expectations. Key screening staff are in short supply. Breast Physicians are desperately needed within the breast screening programme. They can be easily and less expensively trained to undertake the role of radiologists in breast cancer detection, while providing a broader skills, experience and knowledge of breast cancer in addition to a well-developed ability to communicate with patients. It is widely accepted that a woman’s chances of an early diagnosis are far better if her radiology work is analysed by a professional who specializes in breast medicine e.g. a Breast Physician working within a multi-disciplinary team. One member of the BCAC Steering Group can personally attest to her misdiagnosis by a radiologist working within a radiology clinic, one who did not specialise in mammography. It was only by referring herself to a specialist breast clinic, where her mammogram was read by a Breast Physician, that she was eventually diagnosed. Similar stories are often brought to the attention of BCAC. The potential for misdiagnosis would be increased if breast specialty resources were reduced or unavailable. Especially given the nationwide shortage of radiologists, it seems short sighted by Council to consider removing breast physicians who are well qualified to read x-rays, conduct ultrasounds and to make accurate diagnoses. 5. Can other doctors in other areas of the country do the work of the Breast Physician? BCAC has heard from many women who report that while their medical professionals deliver excellent care, they often lack empathy and understanding of the emotional and psychological issues. Each specialist has their own area of expertise and sometimes all a woman needs is to speak with a medical professional who has the skill and time to pull all the information together, organise it and discuss it in an empathetic way to enable the patient to understand. As part of their certification, Breast Physicians are required to counsel 200 women (logged formally) and to attend a recognised counseling course. There are 10-14 Breast Physicians working in New Zealand currently. BCAC believes this should increase to at least 25-30 and be targeted to where the need is greatest. The field of breast medicine originally evolved to fulfill a health need that was not being met and now that need has increased substantially. The MCNZ proposal to deregister Breast Physicians will only broaden the gap between need and provision of services to breast cancer patients. 6. Women with breast cancer will benefit now and in the future if competent medical professionals are attracted to and supported in the area of breast health Early diagnosis of breast cancer results in a greater likelihood of a curative outcome. Delays in diagnosis and treatment can have devastating consequences as early disease may avoidably be allowed to progress to an advanced stage. Breast Physicians dedicated to this area of medicine can expedite a timely diagnosis and can then, given the breadth of their training, support women through the treatment and follow-up process. This serves both clinical and emotional needs for the women helping with their understanding and assimilation of information, thus improving their ability to make appropriate decisions regarding treatment options. This type of care allows a woman to feel she has some control over the situation and results in a greater trust in the medical professionals involved and a better acceptance of the overall process and outcome. The ability to provide internationally recognised levels of care to women with breast disease in New Zealand is already limited by a lack of professional resources. Although numbering only 10-14 in New Zealand, Breast Physicians are an indispensable resource, offering excellence in breast care by providing a unique combination of diagnostic and medical skills coupled with a systemic, holistic approach to breast health, including psychological support. BCAC believes the Council’s decision on breast medicine is short-sighted, given the continuing rise in the incidence of this disease in New Zealand, and reduces the likelihood of optimum outcomes for women with breast disease. 2500 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in our country every year. 1 in 10 women will be affected by breast cancer in their lifetime – some specialists are now saying the rate could be closer to 1 in 8. As long as breast cancer claims over 600 lives every year, two women per day, it is irresponsible to remove resources from the breast cancer front line. Our Breast Physicians provide a valuable resource that BCAC believes must be encouraged, supported and offered opportunities, rather than threatened with de-registration. Every one of the 2500 women diagnosed every year in New Zealand deserves the best care possible, now and in the future. It would clearly be a mistake to remove this resource which currently serves women so well, a resource that will be much needed in the future by a health system that is already struggling to maintain an optimal standard of care. BCAC requests that the MCNZ grant re-accreditation to the vocational scope of breast medicine and encourage the development of this specialty field. Please do not deprive New Zealand women and their families of this much needed, valued and well-respected resource. Libby Burgess
|
||||||||||||||